Kentucky Heartwood
  • Home
  • News and Events
    • Newsletters
    • Forest Blog
    • Music Festival 2022 >
      • Music Festival Pics
    • Past Events >
      • Stonecoal hike
      • Hemlock volunteer days
      • Red Hickory and Herbal Medicine Hike
      • Red Hickory Hike April '22
      • Music Festival 2021
      • Bat Meter Deployment Field Trip 2021
      • Virtual Membership Meeting 2021
      • The Three R's with Davis Mounger
      • White fringeless orchid mural
  • Forest Watch
    • FOIA
    • Jellico >
      • ORG COMMENTS
    • South Redbird Project
    • Blackwater (Cave Run Lake)
    • Red River Gorge
    • Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project
    • Greenwood
    • Pisgah Bay Project
    • Climax & Little Egypt >
      • Crooked Creek Photos 2011
      • Crooked Creek Photos 2010
    • Upper Rock Creek Logging >
      • Rock Creek Hike, November 2009
  • Issues
  • Donate
    • ANNUAL REPORT 2022
  • CONTACT
    • Volunteer
    • SUBSCRIBE
  • Links
  • About
    • Council & Staff

Kentucky Heartwood

We need forests we can get lost in; trees that make us gape; streams we can drink from. 
​Wild places sustain and define us; ​we, in turn, must protect them.

Massive new timber project threatens endangered darter: Comments needed by April 2, 2018

3/28/2018

10 Comments

 
​The U.S. Forest Service has proposed 3,200 acres of intensive logging on the steep and rugged slopes of the Redbird District of the Daniel Boone National Forest. Comments need to be submitted by Monday, April 2nd. The "South Redbird Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Project" threatens critical habitat for the Kentucky arrow darter (Etheostoma spilotum), which was listed as "threatened" under the Endangered Species Act in 2016. The darter is found only in clean waters of the upper Kentucky River, and has disappeared from 44% of its range since 1990. Nearly 900 acres of proposed logging is in the watershed of Elisha Creek, which is also home to the federally-endangered Snuffbox mussel (Epioblasma triquetra). The snuffbox was protected under the Endangered Species Act in 2012 on account of a 62% rangewide decline. Unlike the mainstem of the Redbird River, which is too polluted by mining runoff, oil and gas development, and sewage for these species to live, the clean tributaries in the project area provide habitat needed for these species' survival. 
Picture
A steep slope above Spring Creek approved for logging in 2015.
​Of the 32,300 acres of national forest land in the South Redbird project area, 27% has been harvested since 1980 and only 15% is over 100 years old. This is a stark contrast to the centuries-old forest at Lilley Cornett Woods, just 25 miles to the east. And yet the Forest Service is proposing to log 23% of all forest over 100 years old in the project area. Several areas ranging from 200 to 350 contiguous acres have been proposed for logging. Combined with previous cuts, some sections of forest, up to 800 acres, will hardly have any trees over 30 years old left standing.
Picture
Kentucky arrow darter (Etheostoma spilotum), photo USFWS
The Forest Service proposed the South Redbird project at the same time as a Forest Plan amendment to loosen logging restrictions designed to protect endangered Indiana bats. And another proposal to log several thousand more acres of the London District (the Pine Creek project) was just posted on the Daniel Boone National Forest website. Expect to see more on that soon.
​
The South Redbird project follows a series of public meetings that the Forest Service refers to as “collaborations.” While Kentucky Heartwood is listed as a “collaborator” in the scoping letter, our good-faith input throughout the process was largely ignored. In fact, the project reflects few of the concerns raised by participants – other than those of state and federal agencies pushing for more clearcuts and “regeneration” harvests for ruffed grouse habitat. While the forest has been characterized by some as “too old,” the fact is that less than half the forest is over 70 years old. 
Picture
Protected forest in the Right Fork of Elisha Creek proposed Research Natural Area.
​In 2008, the Forest Service approved 1,200 acres of logging immediately north of the South Redbird project area as part of the Group One Redbird River Project. The Group One project included a Forest Plan amendment that established a 12,000 acre “Ruffed Grouse Emphasis Area” to be maintained under 60 year timber rotations in cooperation with the Kentucky Division of Fish and Wildlife Management. Kentucky Heartwood successfully appealed that project twice before it was approved after a third revision. Despite the specific grouse emphasis, after 10 years neither federal nor state managers can answer questions regarding the success or failure of their grouse management. And yet they insist we need more forests cleared across the district for grouse. Kentucky Heartwood suggested early in the process that the Forest Service consider meeting forage needs for grouse by incorporating small to medium-sized group selection cuts in a matrix of thinning oriented toward old-growth structural development. But this would mean less timber getting cut, and apparently that’s not worthy of serious consideration. 
Picture
Despite its rugged beauty and rich diversity, the Redbird District is being treated like a throw-away district by the U.S. Forest Service. There are no hiking trails and no campgrounds – issues that were raised repeatedly during public meetings by members of the public and U.S. Forest Service staff. The only recreational infrastructure is the extensive Redbird Crest ATV trail, which the Forest Service proposes to reroute with 12 new miles of ATV trail construction. National forest lands in the Redbird District are an island in a landscape of vast strip mines and clearcuts. The forest here needs to be protected and nurtured, and we think that the Forest Service can do better. Please help encourage them to do so.

Official documents for the project can be found on the Daniel Boone National Forest website. And more information can be found on our website here.

Comments are due by Monday, April 2, 2018, and should be emailed to:
comments-southern-daniel-boone-redbird@fs.fed.us

Please note in the subject line that the comments are for South Red Bird Project.
​

Comments can also be mailed by U.S. Postal Service to:

Robert Claybrook
Redbird District Ranger
91 Peabody Road
Big Creek, KY 40914

Email Address Correction:
We have heard from several people that the Forest Service email address we linked to is invalid. Thanks for letting us know! We tracked down the error in the email address and corrected it on our website. There was an invisible extra dash that was in the email address between the word southern and daniel. This happened because we copied the email address from the scanned pdf provided by the Forest Service, and the optical character recognition must have added this extra dash. Many programs will turn two dashes in a row into one dash, and that is what happened in this case, resulting in an invisible extra dash. I deleted it and now it should work. Sorry about that!!

The correct email is (the one in the post above has been corrected as well): 
comments-southern-daniel-boone-redbird@fs.fed.us

Make sure when you copy/paste that there is no space or period at the end of the email address as well. If you have any issues sending your comment in, please let us know.

Feel free to copy kentuckyheartwood@gmail.com on your comment email.

Also, you should receive a confirmation reply from the Forest Service letting you know your message was received. Sometimes it takes a few hours to receive the notice. If you do not receive one, that means they did not get your message.

Also note, if you go to the page for sending comments on the DBNF website, old information for sending comments to Jared Calvert is posted there. The correct instructions for commenting are in the scoping letter, posted on this page of the DBNF website. 
10 Comments
Jamie Tipton link
3/28/2018 09:47:50 pm

I tried twice to email my opposition to the listed website and received an invalid email address. For the record, I am opposed to any logging that threatens old-growth forests and the endangered species that live there.

Reply
Lenette Hicks
3/28/2018 11:01:49 pm

Delete the period from the end of the e-mail address. You will receive a confirmation that your e-mail was received.

Reply
Tina Marie
3/29/2018 12:07:47 pm

Thanks for letting us know! I updated the web page so the period no longer is at the end of the email address. Hope that helps!

Yolanda Estes
3/29/2018 11:20:17 am

I strongly object to any logging of any kind in these woods for that matter. Think about it, we may want some oxygen to breath someday and make the trees make the oxygen. It destroys the beauty of the country. Can we never be satisfied and quit cutting trees. Please don't destroy the beauty of this world.
PLEASE!!!!!!!!

Reply
john
3/29/2018 01:26:59 pm

The email address to respond is still (12:25 CDST 03/29/18) incorrect, my comment has been returned from USDA after two attempts

Reply
Tina marie
3/29/2018 01:40:41 pm

Would you mind trying one more time and copying kentuckyheartwood@gmail.com on your message? We have tested the email and received a response form the Forest Service that it was received using this email address: comments-southern­-daniel-boone-redbird@fs.fed.us (if you copy/paste the address into your email, make sure there is not a space or period at the end of the address).

Thanks for letting us know, several people have reported this problem and we want to figure out exactly what is going wrong.

Reply
Tina Marie
3/29/2018 02:09:11 pm

I just found the error. There was an invisible extra dash that was in the email address between the word southern and daniel. I deleted it and now it should work. Sorry about that!! The correct email is: comments-southern­-daniel-boone-redbird@fs.fed.us

john bauer
3/29/2018 03:25:06 pm

Email link is correct now, works, thanks

Tina Marie
3/29/2018 02:20:38 pm

We have heard from several people that the Forest Service email address we linked to is invalid. Thanks for letting us know! I tracked down the error in the email address and corrected it on our website. (There was an invisible extra dash that was in the email address between the word southern and daniel. This happened because we copied the email address from the scanned pdf provided by the Forest Service, and the optical character recognition must have added this extra dash. Many programs will turn two dashes in a row into one dash, and that is what happened in this case, resulting in an invisible extra dash. I deleted it and now it should work). Sorry about that!! The correct email is: comments-southern-daniel-boone-redbird@fs.fed.us

Make sure when you copy/paste that there is no space or period at the end of the email address as well.

If you have any issues sending your comment in, please let us know. Feel free to copy kentuckyheartwood@gmail.com on your comment email.

Also, you should receive a confirmation reply from the Forest Service letting you know your message was received. Sometimes it takes a few hours to receive the notice. If you do not receive one, that means they did not get your message.

Reply
Joe
3/31/2018 01:45:35 pm

There are obvious ways the grouse habitat an be enhanced and created while the water quality and stream beds are protected.

If the steep surface angles portrayed in the photos are what they propose to clear cut, then I would observe that is both too steep to log very effectively and also highly unlikely to provide attractive grouse habitat. Surely in that part of the forest they can find some ridge tops and more suitable ground for non -intrusive logging and more ability to adequately control runoff in to fragile waters.

Frankly that kind of a presentationI have seen on this project is almost set up to fail, and extract a radical response from environmentalists, as it presents no alternatives other than severe , and likely to erode, steep terrain logging. Theres a lot of land in the Red bird district. Logging does not have to be done in critical areas where the conflicts almost seem to be contrived by the selection of the terrain. The fish and the mussels can receive protection if they rework the plans to just log ridge tops , where grouse will be better served , and implement sound sediment control practices in order the stream beds can be protected. It is not rocket science.

I know a good bit about grosue ecology and also about darters. They are not mutually exclusive critters if the logging is better planned and stream buffers are implemented.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    November 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    May 2021
    March 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    July 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    December 2015
    May 2014
    February 2014
    November 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    February 2012
    October 2011
    August 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    February 2010
    November 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009

    Categories

    All
    Adventure Tourism
    Bats
    Big South Fork
    Coal
    Comment Letters
    Dance
    Daniel Boone Nf
    Dbnf
    Division Of Forestry
    Event
    Film
    Forest Council
    Forest Plan
    Forest Resource Assessment
    Fundraiser
    Great Places
    Greenwood
    Health
    Heartwood
    Hemlock Woolly Adelgid
    Horses
    Invasive Plants
    Landfill
    Litigation
    Logging
    Mountaintop Removal
    Natural Bridge
    Pipeline
    Redbird
    Robinson Forest
    Rock Creek
    State Nature Preserves
    Thanks
    Website
    White Nose Syndrome
    Ymca

    RSS Feed

  • Home
  • News and Events
    • Newsletters
    • Forest Blog
    • Music Festival 2022 >
      • Music Festival Pics
    • Past Events >
      • Stonecoal hike
      • Hemlock volunteer days
      • Red Hickory and Herbal Medicine Hike
      • Red Hickory Hike April '22
      • Music Festival 2021
      • Bat Meter Deployment Field Trip 2021
      • Virtual Membership Meeting 2021
      • The Three R's with Davis Mounger
      • White fringeless orchid mural
  • Forest Watch
    • FOIA
    • Jellico >
      • ORG COMMENTS
    • South Redbird Project
    • Blackwater (Cave Run Lake)
    • Red River Gorge
    • Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project
    • Greenwood
    • Pisgah Bay Project
    • Climax & Little Egypt >
      • Crooked Creek Photos 2011
      • Crooked Creek Photos 2010
    • Upper Rock Creek Logging >
      • Rock Creek Hike, November 2009
  • Issues
  • Donate
    • ANNUAL REPORT 2022
  • CONTACT
    • Volunteer
    • SUBSCRIBE
  • Links
  • About
    • Council & Staff