Kentucky Heartwood
We need forests we can get lost in; trees that make us gape; streams we can drink from.
Wild places sustain and define us; we, in turn, must protect them.
Wild places sustain and define us; we, in turn, must protect them.
Pine Creek Project
Up to four-thousand acres of logging proposed in London District of the Daniel Boone National Forest
Official documents for the Pine Creek Forest Restoration project can be found on the Daniel Boone National Forest website.
Keep scrolling down this page for more information, updates, documents and maps.
You can read comments that have been submitted by the public, here.
Keep scrolling down this page for more information, updates, documents and maps.
You can read comments that have been submitted by the public, here.
Kentucky Heartwood Challenges Pine Creek Project
Posted 11-30-19
On November 14, 2019, Kentucky Heartwood filed a formal administrative objection (“pre-decisional objection”) challenging the approval of the Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project on the Daniel Boone National Forest. The Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project (“Pine Creek project”) proposes a wide range of vegetation management activities across 45,700 acres of the Daniel Boone National Forest in Laurel, Rockcastle, and Pulaski Counties, Kentucky.
This complicated project has the potential to benefit some parts of forest by implementing well-thought-out restoration efforts, while degrading other areas through heavy-handed and unneeded logging operations. The Pine Creek project was originally proposed in March, 2018.
On November 14, 2019, Kentucky Heartwood filed a formal administrative objection (“pre-decisional objection”) challenging the approval of the Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project on the Daniel Boone National Forest. The Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project (“Pine Creek project”) proposes a wide range of vegetation management activities across 45,700 acres of the Daniel Boone National Forest in Laurel, Rockcastle, and Pulaski Counties, Kentucky.
This complicated project has the potential to benefit some parts of forest by implementing well-thought-out restoration efforts, while degrading other areas through heavy-handed and unneeded logging operations. The Pine Creek project was originally proposed in March, 2018.
Kentucky Heartwood was joined in their objection by the Kentucky Resources Council, and Christopher Morris. KRC has also posted the objection on their website here.
Read the entirety of Kentucky Heartwood's formal administrative objection here:
Read the entirety of Kentucky Heartwood's formal administrative objection here:

pine_creek_predecisional_objection.pdf | |
File Size: | 318 kb |
File Type: |
Pine Creek project comments due by September 4, 2019
August 24, 2019 update, originally published on our Forest Blog
The Daniel Boone National Forest is currently taking comments on the Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project. This is a complicated project, which proposes intensive and damaging logging on thousands of acres of forest, but also includes plans for beneficial restoration and management for rare species and natural communities. Below you will find a breakdown of the main proposed actions to help inform your comments to the Forest Service. Comments are due by Wednesday, September 4th, 2019. Directions on how to submit comments are the end of this post.
You can read our May 2018 comments to the Forest Service on an earlier draft (scoping) of the Pine Creek proposal here. Video of a presentation that we gave in Corbin in January 2019 can be found here.
You can read our May 2018 comments to the Forest Service on an earlier draft (scoping) of the Pine Creek proposal here. Video of a presentation that we gave in Corbin in January 2019 can be found here.
Background
The Pine Creek project covers 45,700 acres of the Daniel Boone National Forest in Laurel, Pulaski, and Rockcastle counties. The area is centered on the lower Rockcastle River, from near I-75 to the confluence with the Cumberland River. This area includes some of the most popular recreation spots in the Daniel Boone, including Bee Rock, Rockcastle Recreation Area, Little Lick, Scuttle Hole, the Sheltowee Trace National Recreation Trail, Pine Island Double Falls, and the Wild River segment of the Rockcastle River. The area also includes a wide diversity of forest types and rare species, including some of the best old-growth and mature second growth forests in the Daniel Boone. The Forest Service first proposed the Pine Creek project in February 2018. Since the initial proposal the agency has made some improvements, but there are still major problems that need to be addressed.
The Bad Stuff:
Shelterwood logging on 1,300 acres for early seral habitat
Our most significant concern with the Pine Creek project is the Forest Service’s intent to log 1,300 acres for early seral habitat (young forest) using shelterwood methods (Action 1.A: Two-aged shelterwood). A shelterwood cut is a type of “regeneration” harvest where about 90% of the trees are cut. The Forest Service says that individual shelterwood cuts would be limited to 40 acres each, but some of these logging areas would be clustered to create logged areas of several hundred acres. The Forest Service originally proposed to approve an additional 2,000 acres of shelterwood harvests that would occur after 10 years (in stands managed under Action 5: Midstory removal), but has since agreed to drop logging these acres from the proposal.
Early seral habitat is important for a wide range of species. However, there are less impactful ways to create and manage for this type of habitat that are more consistent with prevalent natural disturbance regimes. For example, research from the University of Kentucky has shown that logging small, roughly half-acre patches of trees, along with light thinning around the edges (also known as “femelschlag” or “expanding gap” systems), can result in much better oak regeneration than large even-aged harvests like those proposed in the Pine Creek project. While uneven-aged and lower impact methods like expanding gap management could meet the Forest Service’s habitat and multiple-use goals, these methods don’t produce as much timber.
Shelterwood logging on 1,300 acres for early seral habitat
Our most significant concern with the Pine Creek project is the Forest Service’s intent to log 1,300 acres for early seral habitat (young forest) using shelterwood methods (Action 1.A: Two-aged shelterwood). A shelterwood cut is a type of “regeneration” harvest where about 90% of the trees are cut. The Forest Service says that individual shelterwood cuts would be limited to 40 acres each, but some of these logging areas would be clustered to create logged areas of several hundred acres. The Forest Service originally proposed to approve an additional 2,000 acres of shelterwood harvests that would occur after 10 years (in stands managed under Action 5: Midstory removal), but has since agreed to drop logging these acres from the proposal.
Early seral habitat is important for a wide range of species. However, there are less impactful ways to create and manage for this type of habitat that are more consistent with prevalent natural disturbance regimes. For example, research from the University of Kentucky has shown that logging small, roughly half-acre patches of trees, along with light thinning around the edges (also known as “femelschlag” or “expanding gap” systems), can result in much better oak regeneration than large even-aged harvests like those proposed in the Pine Creek project. While uneven-aged and lower impact methods like expanding gap management could meet the Forest Service’s habitat and multiple-use goals, these methods don’t produce as much timber.
We strenuously urge the Forest Service to drop the proposed shelterwood harvests and instead manage for early seral habitat and oak regeneration in the following ways:
1) Manage the nearly 5,000 acres of forests harvested in the project area since 1980. Many of these areas are now forests of poor quality, with prior logging resulting in conversion of oak-hickory forests to tulip poplar and red maple. Expansion and modification of “Action 6: Crop tree release” could meet the Forest Service’s goals for early seral habitat;
2) Support the existing proposal for 980 acres of commercial and non-commercial management to restore fire-adapted woodland community types (Action 2: Woodland and wooded grassland/shrubland communities);
3) Support variable thinning along certain roadsides to create early seral and edge habitat and support rare species on 280 acres (Action 9.B: Roadside thinning);
4) Consider uneven-aged management with small group selection using expanding gap or femelschlag prescriptions where the above approaches aren’t sufficient.
1) Manage the nearly 5,000 acres of forests harvested in the project area since 1980. Many of these areas are now forests of poor quality, with prior logging resulting in conversion of oak-hickory forests to tulip poplar and red maple. Expansion and modification of “Action 6: Crop tree release” could meet the Forest Service’s goals for early seral habitat;
2) Support the existing proposal for 980 acres of commercial and non-commercial management to restore fire-adapted woodland community types (Action 2: Woodland and wooded grassland/shrubland communities);
3) Support variable thinning along certain roadsides to create early seral and edge habitat and support rare species on 280 acres (Action 9.B: Roadside thinning);
4) Consider uneven-aged management with small group selection using expanding gap or femelschlag prescriptions where the above approaches aren’t sufficient.
The Good Stuff:
The Forest Service is doing a lot in Pine Creek project that we largely support, and have made some changes since their original proposal that make it better. While Kentucky Heartwood generally opposes logging in our national forest lands, this project does include some commercial thinning prescriptions that offer a reasonable approach for restoring and supporting rare and declining species and natural communities.
1) The Pine Creek project proposes using a variety of methods, including non-commercial and commercial tree removal and prescribed fire to restore upland, fire-adapted wooded grassland and shrubland communities (“woodlands”) in areas that were identified through collaborative work with the Kentucky Office of Nature Preserves, Kentucky Heartwood, and The Nature Conservancy (Action 2: Woodland and wooded grassland/shrubland communities). Most of the areas identified in the proposal for woodland management are good, or at least reasonable, choices given the specifics of the existing and historical vegetation.
Integrated with the woodland restoration is the proposed restoration of shortleaf and pitch pine communities (which were decimated by the southern pine beetle 20 years ago) through “cluster planting” of pine seedlings. Unlike prior pine restoration activities on the Daniel Boone that are more akin to plantations, “cluster planting” would restore a pine component in a manner that supports mixed species, spatially diverse stands.
2) The Forest Service added to the proposal, as a response to input from Kentucky Heartwood and others, Action 8.D, which would approve thinning of the forest along the margins of a 1-mile section of powerline right-of-way that contains good quality native grassland remnants (read about the Cumberland Barrens here). Combined with ongoing application of prescribed fire, this management would create a gradient, or “ecotone,” between the native grassland remnants restricted to the right-of-way and the closed-canopy forest adjacent to them. This approach, which leverages existing native grassland flora as indicator species and seed source, offers a viable bridge between the Forest Service’s logging mandate and legitimate ecological restoration efforts. The Draft EA states that “If this activity successfully achieves the desired habitat condition, it may be replicated along other ROWs through separate project planning.” We have been working with the Southeastern Grasslands Initiative to promote a similar emphasis at Land Between the Lakes.
3) In response to our earlier comments, the Forest Service has proposed relocating 1 mile of the Sheltowee Trace National Recreation Trail off of Poison Honey Road and in into the forest, while also buffering trails and recreation areas from logging impacts (Action 9.D).
4) The Forest Service has also added Action 9.C to close and rehabilitate up to 23 miles of user-made trails that are negatively impacting the Rockcastle River.
The Forest Service is doing a lot in Pine Creek project that we largely support, and have made some changes since their original proposal that make it better. While Kentucky Heartwood generally opposes logging in our national forest lands, this project does include some commercial thinning prescriptions that offer a reasonable approach for restoring and supporting rare and declining species and natural communities.
1) The Pine Creek project proposes using a variety of methods, including non-commercial and commercial tree removal and prescribed fire to restore upland, fire-adapted wooded grassland and shrubland communities (“woodlands”) in areas that were identified through collaborative work with the Kentucky Office of Nature Preserves, Kentucky Heartwood, and The Nature Conservancy (Action 2: Woodland and wooded grassland/shrubland communities). Most of the areas identified in the proposal for woodland management are good, or at least reasonable, choices given the specifics of the existing and historical vegetation.
Integrated with the woodland restoration is the proposed restoration of shortleaf and pitch pine communities (which were decimated by the southern pine beetle 20 years ago) through “cluster planting” of pine seedlings. Unlike prior pine restoration activities on the Daniel Boone that are more akin to plantations, “cluster planting” would restore a pine component in a manner that supports mixed species, spatially diverse stands.
2) The Forest Service added to the proposal, as a response to input from Kentucky Heartwood and others, Action 8.D, which would approve thinning of the forest along the margins of a 1-mile section of powerline right-of-way that contains good quality native grassland remnants (read about the Cumberland Barrens here). Combined with ongoing application of prescribed fire, this management would create a gradient, or “ecotone,” between the native grassland remnants restricted to the right-of-way and the closed-canopy forest adjacent to them. This approach, which leverages existing native grassland flora as indicator species and seed source, offers a viable bridge between the Forest Service’s logging mandate and legitimate ecological restoration efforts. The Draft EA states that “If this activity successfully achieves the desired habitat condition, it may be replicated along other ROWs through separate project planning.” We have been working with the Southeastern Grasslands Initiative to promote a similar emphasis at Land Between the Lakes.
3) In response to our earlier comments, the Forest Service has proposed relocating 1 mile of the Sheltowee Trace National Recreation Trail off of Poison Honey Road and in into the forest, while also buffering trails and recreation areas from logging impacts (Action 9.D).
4) The Forest Service has also added Action 9.C to close and rehabilitate up to 23 miles of user-made trails that are negatively impacting the Rockcastle River.
The “Sounds Good But is Actually Underwhelming” Stuff:
The Forest Service has proposed adding 500 acres of “Designated Old-Growth” in the project area. This is good. However, the Forest Service has restricted these old-growth additions to hemlock mixed mesophytic forests below cliffline (where logging is already restricted), and neglected to allocate any upland forest communities to the old-growth management prescription. While the Draft EA points out the project area already includes 830 acres of an existing “Designated Old-Growth” prescription area, that particular area doesn’t actually include any old-growth or near- old-growth forest. Most of the best upland forests meeting, or nearing, operational old-growth definitions are being left out of the Designated Old-Growth management prescription. We wrote extensively about our old-growth concerns in our previous comments on the project in 2018, which can be read here.
The Forest Service has proposed adding 500 acres of “Designated Old-Growth” in the project area. This is good. However, the Forest Service has restricted these old-growth additions to hemlock mixed mesophytic forests below cliffline (where logging is already restricted), and neglected to allocate any upland forest communities to the old-growth management prescription. While the Draft EA points out the project area already includes 830 acres of an existing “Designated Old-Growth” prescription area, that particular area doesn’t actually include any old-growth or near- old-growth forest. Most of the best upland forests meeting, or nearing, operational old-growth definitions are being left out of the Designated Old-Growth management prescription. We wrote extensively about our old-growth concerns in our previous comments on the project in 2018, which can be read here.
Pine Creek Project: Presentation & Forum January 24, 2019
UPDATE: A video of the forum presentation is available here. We apologize for the poor sound quality.
Posted January 9, 2019
Kentucky Heartwood will host a presentation and forum in Corbin on the evening of Thursday, January 24th to discuss the Forest Service’s proposed Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project on the Daniel Boone National Forest in Laurel, Pulaski, and Rockcastle Counties. The Pine Creek project proposes up to of 4,000 acres of commercial logging in addition to prescribed fire, pine plantings, non-commercial thinning of forests that were clearcut in the 1980s and 1990s, and other management activities.
This complicated project has the potential to benefit some parts of forest by implementing well-thought-out restoration efforts, while degrading other areas through heavy-handed and unneeded logging operations. The Pine Creek project was originally proposed in March, 2018. The release of the Environmental Assessment for the project, and an associated public comment period, are expected in early 2019.
This part of the London Ranger District of the Daniel Boone National Forest, which follows the Rockcastle River from just south of I-75 to its confluence with the Cumberland River, provides for a wide range of recreational uses and has become increasingly popular in recent years. Decisions and commitments made by the U.S. Forest Service as part of the Pine Creek project will set the management direction for this section of the Daniel Boone National Forest for many years. Public input is important.
The presentation and forum will take place from 6:30 to 8:00 pm at 2nd & Main in Corbin, located at 115 South Main Street. This event is free and open to the public. For more information email jim@kyheartwood.org, or call (859) 334-0602.
Kentucky Heartwood will host a presentation and forum in Corbin on the evening of Thursday, January 24th to discuss the Forest Service’s proposed Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project on the Daniel Boone National Forest in Laurel, Pulaski, and Rockcastle Counties. The Pine Creek project proposes up to of 4,000 acres of commercial logging in addition to prescribed fire, pine plantings, non-commercial thinning of forests that were clearcut in the 1980s and 1990s, and other management activities.
This complicated project has the potential to benefit some parts of forest by implementing well-thought-out restoration efforts, while degrading other areas through heavy-handed and unneeded logging operations. The Pine Creek project was originally proposed in March, 2018. The release of the Environmental Assessment for the project, and an associated public comment period, are expected in early 2019.
This part of the London Ranger District of the Daniel Boone National Forest, which follows the Rockcastle River from just south of I-75 to its confluence with the Cumberland River, provides for a wide range of recreational uses and has become increasingly popular in recent years. Decisions and commitments made by the U.S. Forest Service as part of the Pine Creek project will set the management direction for this section of the Daniel Boone National Forest for many years. Public input is important.
The presentation and forum will take place from 6:30 to 8:00 pm at 2nd & Main in Corbin, located at 115 South Main Street. This event is free and open to the public. For more information email jim@kyheartwood.org, or call (859) 334-0602.
Pine Creek Project Update
December 2018 update, originally published in our Fall 2018 newsletter
There’s still no word from the Forest Service on when the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Pine Creek project will come out. We’re anticipating that the EA and next public comment period will take place early in 2019.
The Pine Creek project includes several thousand acres of logging in the London District in Laurel and Pulaski Counties. Most of the timber harvesting being proposed by the Forest Service would be in the form of shelterwood cuts that would remove most of the trees. The project also includes some potentially beneficial restoration work in upland, fire-adapted communities.
We have continued work to survey more of the project area in the field. Unfortunately, we have found that there are some really nice forests planned for intensive logging. And, like the South Redbird project, many of the proposed Pine Creek harvest sites are adjacent to areas that were cut over in the 1980’s and 1990’s. If Pine Creek is approved, there will be several areas in the hundreds of acres with no forest older than about 35 years. More information about the Pine Creek project can be found in our Summer 2018 newsletter, and you can find even more details and documents related to the project on our website (scroll down on this page for official documents, maps and more).
On a related note, we learned recently that county road crews in Pulaski and Laurel counties have been grading and scraping through rare roadside wood lily sites in the project area. Despite the work being done to protect these sites by the Kentucky Office of Nature Preserves and Kentucky Heartwood, the Forest Service has repeatedly failed to communicate with the county road departments that manage these roadsides in the Daniel Boone. An exception is the work to protect certain roadsides in the Curt Pond Ridge area of the Stearns District as part of our collaborative work with the Forest Service and the Office of Nature Preserves at that site. Sadly, there seem to be ample resources for the agency to plan thousands of acres of logging to “restore” the forest, while we watch rare species and their habitat get obliterated.
There’s still no word from the Forest Service on when the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Pine Creek project will come out. We’re anticipating that the EA and next public comment period will take place early in 2019.
The Pine Creek project includes several thousand acres of logging in the London District in Laurel and Pulaski Counties. Most of the timber harvesting being proposed by the Forest Service would be in the form of shelterwood cuts that would remove most of the trees. The project also includes some potentially beneficial restoration work in upland, fire-adapted communities.
We have continued work to survey more of the project area in the field. Unfortunately, we have found that there are some really nice forests planned for intensive logging. And, like the South Redbird project, many of the proposed Pine Creek harvest sites are adjacent to areas that were cut over in the 1980’s and 1990’s. If Pine Creek is approved, there will be several areas in the hundreds of acres with no forest older than about 35 years. More information about the Pine Creek project can be found in our Summer 2018 newsletter, and you can find even more details and documents related to the project on our website (scroll down on this page for official documents, maps and more).
On a related note, we learned recently that county road crews in Pulaski and Laurel counties have been grading and scraping through rare roadside wood lily sites in the project area. Despite the work being done to protect these sites by the Kentucky Office of Nature Preserves and Kentucky Heartwood, the Forest Service has repeatedly failed to communicate with the county road departments that manage these roadsides in the Daniel Boone. An exception is the work to protect certain roadsides in the Curt Pond Ridge area of the Stearns District as part of our collaborative work with the Forest Service and the Office of Nature Preserves at that site. Sadly, there seem to be ample resources for the agency to plan thousands of acres of logging to “restore” the forest, while we watch rare species and their habitat get obliterated.
Kentucky Heartwood comments on proposed
Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project
Update Posted May 3, 2018
Kentucky Heartwood has submitted comments to the Daniel Boone National Forest concerning the proposed "Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project". Click here for a downloadable PDF of our comment letter.
It is very important that the Forest Service receive comments from the public. Feel free to use Kentucky Heartwood's comments as a point of reference for writing your own. You are also welcome to copy our comments and state to the Forest Service that you agree with them, if that makes it quicker or more likely for you to submit comments. But, keep in mind that comments have the most influence if they are written in your own words.
Official documents for the project can be found on the Daniel Boone National Forest website. Or, keep scrolling down this page for more information, updates, documents and maps.
The Forest Service has provided a comment form on their website here. They have also added a link to a reading room, where you can read comments that have been submitted by the public.
Comments are due by Monday, April 2, 2018, and should be emailed to:
comments-southern-daniel-boone-london@fs.fed.us
Please note in the subject line that the comments are for Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project.
Comments can also be mailed by U.S. Postal Service to:
Jason E. Nedlo
London District Ranger
761 South Laurel Road
London, Kentucky 40744
Kentucky Heartwood has submitted comments to the Daniel Boone National Forest concerning the proposed "Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project". Click here for a downloadable PDF of our comment letter.
It is very important that the Forest Service receive comments from the public. Feel free to use Kentucky Heartwood's comments as a point of reference for writing your own. You are also welcome to copy our comments and state to the Forest Service that you agree with them, if that makes it quicker or more likely for you to submit comments. But, keep in mind that comments have the most influence if they are written in your own words.
Official documents for the project can be found on the Daniel Boone National Forest website. Or, keep scrolling down this page for more information, updates, documents and maps.
The Forest Service has provided a comment form on their website here. They have also added a link to a reading room, where you can read comments that have been submitted by the public.
Comments are due by Monday, April 2, 2018, and should be emailed to:
comments-southern-daniel-boone-london@fs.fed.us
Please note in the subject line that the comments are for Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project.
Comments can also be mailed by U.S. Postal Service to:
Jason E. Nedlo
London District Ranger
761 South Laurel Road
London, Kentucky 40744

pine_creek_scoping_comments.pdf | |
File Size: | 3965 kb |
File Type: |
Update posted April 29, 2018
Below is a large-format, georeferenced PDF map of the Pine Creek project area created by Kentucky Heartwood using data from the United States Forest Service and other sources. In this map you can see where the Sheltowee Trace runs north/south through the project area, in addition to other trails (red lines) including at Bee Rock, Scuttle Hole, and other popular sites. Also noted on this map are forests that have been logged since 1980, and the locations of some of the oldest forests in the area (over 130 years old).
The larger file size version (21MB) has better clarity, while the reduced file size version (4MB) may be easier to download and handle. Either version can be uploaded to your GPS-enabled phone or tablet and used to navigate the project area with the Avenza Maps application. We do not warranty the accuracy of the data provided, and recommend caution and multiple map sources any time you get out in the woods.
Below is a large-format, georeferenced PDF map of the Pine Creek project area created by Kentucky Heartwood using data from the United States Forest Service and other sources. In this map you can see where the Sheltowee Trace runs north/south through the project area, in addition to other trails (red lines) including at Bee Rock, Scuttle Hole, and other popular sites. Also noted on this map are forests that have been logged since 1980, and the locations of some of the oldest forests in the area (over 130 years old).
The larger file size version (21MB) has better clarity, while the reduced file size version (4MB) may be easier to download and handle. Either version can be uploaded to your GPS-enabled phone or tablet and used to navigate the project area with the Avenza Maps application. We do not warranty the accuracy of the data provided, and recommend caution and multiple map sources any time you get out in the woods.
The map file in the reader above is high resolution. The files are also available for download, below. The _rfs is the reduced file size map.
![]()
|
![]()
|
Update Posted April 25, 2018
The Daniel Boone National Forest Service has added a comment form on their website here. They have also added a link to a reading room, where you can read comments that have been submitted by the public.
Kentucky Heartwood is in the process of writing up a comment letter on this project and we will post it as soon as it is ready. Once they are posted, please feel free to use Kentucky Heartwood's comments as a point of reference for writing your own. You are also welcome to copy our comments and state to the Forest Service that you agree with them, if that makes it quicker or more likely for you to submit comments. In the meantime, we encourage you to get familiar with the project, especially noting any areas that you are personally familiar with, to make your comments as specific and personal as possible.
More information about the project is posted below.
The Daniel Boone National Forest Service has added a comment form on their website here. They have also added a link to a reading room, where you can read comments that have been submitted by the public.
Kentucky Heartwood is in the process of writing up a comment letter on this project and we will post it as soon as it is ready. Once they are posted, please feel free to use Kentucky Heartwood's comments as a point of reference for writing your own. You are also welcome to copy our comments and state to the Forest Service that you agree with them, if that makes it quicker or more likely for you to submit comments. In the meantime, we encourage you to get familiar with the project, especially noting any areas that you are personally familiar with, to make your comments as specific and personal as possible.
More information about the project is posted below.

pine_creek_project_map.pdf | |
File Size: | 5873 kb |
File Type: |
Posted April 15, 2018
UPDATE: The Forest Service has officially extended the comment period to May 14, 2018 after we posted that they had not notified the public about the scoping period.
UPDATE: The Forest Service has officially extended the comment period to May 14, 2018 after we posted that they had not notified the public about the scoping period.
Four thousand acres of logging proposed in London District of the Daniel Boone. Comments due May 14, 2018.
(The due date was originally Monday, April 23rd)
Posted April 9, 2018
The Forest Service has proposed yet another new, large logging project, this time proposing over 4,000 acres of timber harvesting in the London District of the Daniel Boone National Forest in Laurel, Pulaski, and Rockcastle Counties. The Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project comes at the same time that the Forest Service proposed 3,200 acres of new logging in the Redbird District, and just weeks after the Forest Service proposed to loosen logging restrictions designed to protect endangered Indiana bats.
Comments on the Pine Creek project are due by May 14, 2018 (the due date was originally Monday, April 23rd). These are your public lands, and your voice matters. Directions on how to submit comments are at the bottom of this alert.
While the Forest Service signed the Pine Creek scoping letter and posted it to their website on March 22nd, they did not send out any notice whatsoever to the public. We only learned about it because we regularly check their project web pages. The Forest Service has promised to increase the scale and pace of new logging projects. But, if they’re too overwhelmed to even send out notice to the public, what does that say about their ability to properly analyze and consider the impacts of logging over 7,000 acres? What does that say about their commitment to public participation?
The Pine Creek project is a complex vegetation management project centered on the lower Rockcastle River, from near I-75 to the confluence with the Cumberland River. The area includes a wide diversity of forests and rare species, the Rockcastle wild river corridor, and some of the most popular hiking and camping areas in the Daniel Boone National Forest. The Forest Service has proposed some good management activities that we support, and some not-so-good management activities that we oppose. While we still need more time to analyze things and check conditions on the ground, below we offer our take on some of the main proposed actions to help you understand the project and submit comments.
Early seral habitat/Shelterwood logging
The Forest Service has proposed an initial 1,300 acres of logging to create early seral habitat (young forest conditions). Most of this logging will be in the form of even-aged shelterwood harvests, leaving 7 to 20 trees per acre in 40 acre patches. They also state that they plan to implement shelterwood harvests on 2,000 additional acres approximately 10 years after implementing the proposed midstory thinnings. Some proposed shelterwood logging is along the Sheltowee Trace National Recreation Trail. The combined 3,300 acres of intensive, even-aged logging represents our greatest concerns with the Pine Creek project.
The Forest Service has proposed yet another new, large logging project, this time proposing over 4,000 acres of timber harvesting in the London District of the Daniel Boone National Forest in Laurel, Pulaski, and Rockcastle Counties. The Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project comes at the same time that the Forest Service proposed 3,200 acres of new logging in the Redbird District, and just weeks after the Forest Service proposed to loosen logging restrictions designed to protect endangered Indiana bats.
Comments on the Pine Creek project are due by May 14, 2018 (the due date was originally Monday, April 23rd). These are your public lands, and your voice matters. Directions on how to submit comments are at the bottom of this alert.
While the Forest Service signed the Pine Creek scoping letter and posted it to their website on March 22nd, they did not send out any notice whatsoever to the public. We only learned about it because we regularly check their project web pages. The Forest Service has promised to increase the scale and pace of new logging projects. But, if they’re too overwhelmed to even send out notice to the public, what does that say about their ability to properly analyze and consider the impacts of logging over 7,000 acres? What does that say about their commitment to public participation?
The Pine Creek project is a complex vegetation management project centered on the lower Rockcastle River, from near I-75 to the confluence with the Cumberland River. The area includes a wide diversity of forests and rare species, the Rockcastle wild river corridor, and some of the most popular hiking and camping areas in the Daniel Boone National Forest. The Forest Service has proposed some good management activities that we support, and some not-so-good management activities that we oppose. While we still need more time to analyze things and check conditions on the ground, below we offer our take on some of the main proposed actions to help you understand the project and submit comments.
Early seral habitat/Shelterwood logging
The Forest Service has proposed an initial 1,300 acres of logging to create early seral habitat (young forest conditions). Most of this logging will be in the form of even-aged shelterwood harvests, leaving 7 to 20 trees per acre in 40 acre patches. They also state that they plan to implement shelterwood harvests on 2,000 additional acres approximately 10 years after implementing the proposed midstory thinnings. Some proposed shelterwood logging is along the Sheltowee Trace National Recreation Trail. The combined 3,300 acres of intensive, even-aged logging represents our greatest concerns with the Pine Creek project.
Some of the most significant and lasting impacts relating to logging come from the log landings, skid trails, and temporary roads used to process and haul logs out of the forest under conventional forestry systems. Large log landings, ranging from about ¼ to 1 acre in size, are cleared in the forest and compacted for logging equipment and trucks. Invasive species frequently become established. The Greenwood project, with about 2,500 acres approved for logging, required 139 log landings. “Temporary roads” are bulldozed from landings through the forest, cutting across slopes and acting as vectors for invasive plant species, while remaining trees can suffer damage from felling and hauling.
Kentucky Heartwood often supports (or does not oppose) non-commercial midstory thinning, particularly in order to restore fire-adapted forest structure. However, most of the midstory thinning in the Pine Creek project aims to promote oak establishment in the understory in preparation for the next round of logging. The Forest Service could choose to approve a midstory reduction without subsequent logging, and allow turnover in the canopy to result from natural disturbance. Doing so could promote oak establishment over time while avoiding the damage caused by conventional logging. Early seral habitat is important for a wide range of species. However, this type of habitat is more sustainably created through the restoration of fire-adapted uplands and an acceptance of the role of natural disturbance in our forests.
Kentucky Heartwood often supports (or does not oppose) non-commercial midstory thinning, particularly in order to restore fire-adapted forest structure. However, most of the midstory thinning in the Pine Creek project aims to promote oak establishment in the understory in preparation for the next round of logging. The Forest Service could choose to approve a midstory reduction without subsequent logging, and allow turnover in the canopy to result from natural disturbance. Doing so could promote oak establishment over time while avoiding the damage caused by conventional logging. Early seral habitat is important for a wide range of species. However, this type of habitat is more sustainably created through the restoration of fire-adapted uplands and an acceptance of the role of natural disturbance in our forests.
Establishment of woodland and wooded grassland communities
The Forest Service is proposing to create or restore fire-adapted open forest and forest-grassland communities in the Pine Creek project area. Historical and botanical evidence suggest that these community types were important, and even extensive, in some parts of the project area. They plan to do this through 730 acres of commercial logging that would leave 5 to 40 trees per acre, along with another 160 acres of non-commercial felling. Implemented in the right locations with the right long-term management (particularly short fire return intervals), these natural communities can help support a variety of rare and declining plant and animal species. Most of the woodland and wooded grassland management is proposed for the southwestern section of the project area in Pulaski County, in an area that is generally appropriate for this type of management, and follows detailed discussions and field trips that included the Kentucky Heartwood, the Forest Service, Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission, and The Nature Conservancy. Kentucky Heartwood prefers that the Forest Service rely on natural disturbance, non-commercial felling, and prescribed fire to manage for these community types. We will need more time to examine the specific stands proposed for logging for woodland restoration in order to assess whether or not the sites chosen for logging are reasonable.
The Forest Service is proposing to create or restore fire-adapted open forest and forest-grassland communities in the Pine Creek project area. Historical and botanical evidence suggest that these community types were important, and even extensive, in some parts of the project area. They plan to do this through 730 acres of commercial logging that would leave 5 to 40 trees per acre, along with another 160 acres of non-commercial felling. Implemented in the right locations with the right long-term management (particularly short fire return intervals), these natural communities can help support a variety of rare and declining plant and animal species. Most of the woodland and wooded grassland management is proposed for the southwestern section of the project area in Pulaski County, in an area that is generally appropriate for this type of management, and follows detailed discussions and field trips that included the Kentucky Heartwood, the Forest Service, Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission, and The Nature Conservancy. Kentucky Heartwood prefers that the Forest Service rely on natural disturbance, non-commercial felling, and prescribed fire to manage for these community types. We will need more time to examine the specific stands proposed for logging for woodland restoration in order to assess whether or not the sites chosen for logging are reasonable.
Rare Plants
Kentucky Heartwood has been urging the Forest Service for several years to incorporate good data, surveys, and site-specific information into projects to conserve and enhance declining and rare botanical communities that rely on open, upland conditions. Many of these specific plants and natural communities are relegated to roadsides and powerline corridors, and do not benefit from typical timber harvests. While such information was largely ignored throughout the planning and analysis of the Greenwood project on the Stearns District, there appears to be a genuine effort in the Pine Creek project to support these remnants of the Cumberland Barrens through cooperative work that includes Kentucky Heartwood and the Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commissions.
Kentucky Heartwood has been urging the Forest Service for several years to incorporate good data, surveys, and site-specific information into projects to conserve and enhance declining and rare botanical communities that rely on open, upland conditions. Many of these specific plants and natural communities are relegated to roadsides and powerline corridors, and do not benefit from typical timber harvests. While such information was largely ignored throughout the planning and analysis of the Greenwood project on the Stearns District, there appears to be a genuine effort in the Pine Creek project to support these remnants of the Cumberland Barrens through cooperative work that includes Kentucky Heartwood and the Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commissions.
Old-Growth
The Pine Creek project area includes 830 acres of a roughly 2,200 acre Designated Old-Growth management area. However, like most Designated Old-Growth management areas in the forest, there’s little in the way of genuinely old woods included. The project area also includes another 11,000 acres of riparian and cliffline corridors that are largely excluded from logging, but represent narrow, linear features and not large blocks of forest. Kentucky Heartwood has urged the Forest Service for many years to delineate more old-growth prescription areas in an effort to conserve large sections of older secondary forest that could develop landscape-scale old-growth characteristics in coming decades. The Forest Service has proposed adding 500 acres of Designated Old-Growth in two areas within the Pine Creek project area, near Rock Creek and Angel Hollow. Both areas are good candidates, and should be designated for an old-growth emphasis in the Forest Plan. However, the additions are largely narrow zones in lower landscape positions supporting hemlock-mixed mesophytic forests, and do not include appreciable upland forests. We think that the Forest Service should expand the new Old-Growth Management areas to include appreciable upland forests. It is important to note that the Designated Old-Growth management prescription in the Forest Plan does not preclude the implementation of management activities. What is does mean is that any management that is done should be to support the development of old-growth forest ecosystems.
The Pine Creek project area includes 830 acres of a roughly 2,200 acre Designated Old-Growth management area. However, like most Designated Old-Growth management areas in the forest, there’s little in the way of genuinely old woods included. The project area also includes another 11,000 acres of riparian and cliffline corridors that are largely excluded from logging, but represent narrow, linear features and not large blocks of forest. Kentucky Heartwood has urged the Forest Service for many years to delineate more old-growth prescription areas in an effort to conserve large sections of older secondary forest that could develop landscape-scale old-growth characteristics in coming decades. The Forest Service has proposed adding 500 acres of Designated Old-Growth in two areas within the Pine Creek project area, near Rock Creek and Angel Hollow. Both areas are good candidates, and should be designated for an old-growth emphasis in the Forest Plan. However, the additions are largely narrow zones in lower landscape positions supporting hemlock-mixed mesophytic forests, and do not include appreciable upland forests. We think that the Forest Service should expand the new Old-Growth Management areas to include appreciable upland forests. It is important to note that the Designated Old-Growth management prescription in the Forest Plan does not preclude the implementation of management activities. What is does mean is that any management that is done should be to support the development of old-growth forest ecosystems.
Shortleaf pine stand improvement
The Forest Service has proposed to restore shortleaf pine on 1,500 acres utilizing what we deem as some progressive and ecologically appropriate methods. Shortleaf pine was decimated by the southern pine beetle between 1999 and 2001. Previous approaches to shortleaf pine restoration, particularly those in the Greenwood project in the Stearns District, have relied heavily on logging healthy hardwood stands and planting pines in dense monocultures. The proposed action in the Pine Creek project would rely on noncommercial methods and planting trees in groups and interspersed with existing vegetation, better mimicking natural patterns.
The Forest Service has proposed to restore shortleaf pine on 1,500 acres utilizing what we deem as some progressive and ecologically appropriate methods. Shortleaf pine was decimated by the southern pine beetle between 1999 and 2001. Previous approaches to shortleaf pine restoration, particularly those in the Greenwood project in the Stearns District, have relied heavily on logging healthy hardwood stands and planting pines in dense monocultures. The proposed action in the Pine Creek project would rely on noncommercial methods and planting trees in groups and interspersed with existing vegetation, better mimicking natural patterns.
Prescribed fire
The project area includes 9,300 acres of existing prescribed fire units that were approved in 2014. We believe that the evidence supports the use of prescribed fire in most of these areas. The Pine Creek proposal would add another 2,400 acres of prescribed fire in the project area. Some of the new areas we already know, and we support them being added to the prescribed fire program. Some areas we still need to evaluate, but generally do not have major concerns.
The project area includes 9,300 acres of existing prescribed fire units that were approved in 2014. We believe that the evidence supports the use of prescribed fire in most of these areas. The Pine Creek proposal would add another 2,400 acres of prescribed fire in the project area. Some of the new areas we already know, and we support them being added to the prescribed fire program. Some areas we still need to evaluate, but generally do not have major concerns.
Comments on the Pine Creek project are due by May 14, 2018 (the due date was originally Monday, April 23rd), and should be emailed to:
comments-southern-daniel-boone-london@fs.fed.us
or sent by postal mail to:
Jason E. Nedlo
London District Ranger
761 South Laurel Road
London, Kentucky 40744
Be sure to include “Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project” in the subject line of any comments.
You can review the Forest Service's proposal and documents on our website (scroll on down for lots more info on this project proposal) or on the Daniel Boone National Forest website here.
comments-southern-daniel-boone-london@fs.fed.us
or sent by postal mail to:
Jason E. Nedlo
London District Ranger
761 South Laurel Road
London, Kentucky 40744
Be sure to include “Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project” in the subject line of any comments.
You can review the Forest Service's proposal and documents on our website (scroll on down for lots more info on this project proposal) or on the Daniel Boone National Forest website here.
Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project
February 20, 2018
Here is a link to the Daniel Boone National Forest page which includes documents pertaining to the Pine Creek Forest restoration project which is currently under development. The forest service provided the following information about the Pine Creek project:
This project area covers a total of 113,300 acres, with about 45,700 on NFS lands. The project will restore forest health and structure through vegetation management, improve wildlife habitat, and provide forest products for the local economy.
Project area encompasses the Cromer Ridge as the northern boundary, south through Billows, Ano, and Mt. Victory, to the Cumberland River as the southern boundary.
District: London Ranger District
Project Purpose: Forest products; Vegetation management (other than forest products); Fuels management; Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants; Watershed management; Road management
Project Activity: Road decommissioning; Fuel treatments (non-activity fuels); Forest vegetation improvements; Species habitat improvements; Noxious weed treatments; Species population enhancements; Road maintenance; Road improvements/construction; Timber sales (green)
Here is a link to the Daniel Boone National Forest page which includes documents pertaining to the Pine Creek Forest restoration project which is currently under development. The forest service provided the following information about the Pine Creek project:
This project area covers a total of 113,300 acres, with about 45,700 on NFS lands. The project will restore forest health and structure through vegetation management, improve wildlife habitat, and provide forest products for the local economy.
Project area encompasses the Cromer Ridge as the northern boundary, south through Billows, Ano, and Mt. Victory, to the Cumberland River as the southern boundary.
District: London Ranger District
Project Purpose: Forest products; Vegetation management (other than forest products); Fuels management; Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants; Watershed management; Road management
Project Activity: Road decommissioning; Fuel treatments (non-activity fuels); Forest vegetation improvements; Species habitat improvements; Noxious weed treatments; Species population enhancements; Road maintenance; Road improvements/construction; Timber sales (green)

pine_creek.pdf | |
File Size: | 3716 kb |
File Type: |
Commenting on the Pine Creek Project
The Forest Service has provided the following information about commenting on this project. This information can be found on the Daniel Boone National Forest website here.
Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project #52341: Comments, including anonymous comments, will be accepted at any time. However, comments posted after the close of a designated comment period may not be able to be given full consideration. Anonymous comments and comments submitted after the close of the final designated comment period will not provide the commenter standing for administrative review.
The Forest Service values public participation. Communications from the public regarding this project, including commenter’s names and contact information, will become part of the public record.
Comments, or in some cases other expressions of interest, along with respondent’s contact information, submitted during the comment period may be necessary to establish a respondent’s eligibility to participate in an administrative review for this proposed action. Interested members of the public should review the proposal’s information to determine the applicable administrative review process and the eligibility requirements for that process. The date of the legal notice of opportunity to comment on this proposed action is the exclusive means for calculating the comment period. For proposals to be documented with an Environmental Assessment, the legal notice announcing the comment period appears in the Newspaper of Record . For Draft Environmental Impact Statements, the Notice of Availability announcing the comment period appears in the Federal Register.
Submitting Comments
If you wish to submit a comment, please send it to:
Jared Calvert
London Ranger District
761 S. Laurel Rd. , London, KY, 40351
jaredcalvert@fs.fed.us
The Forest Service has provided the following information about commenting on this project. This information can be found on the Daniel Boone National Forest website here.
Pine Creek Forest Restoration Project #52341: Comments, including anonymous comments, will be accepted at any time. However, comments posted after the close of a designated comment period may not be able to be given full consideration. Anonymous comments and comments submitted after the close of the final designated comment period will not provide the commenter standing for administrative review.
The Forest Service values public participation. Communications from the public regarding this project, including commenter’s names and contact information, will become part of the public record.
Comments, or in some cases other expressions of interest, along with respondent’s contact information, submitted during the comment period may be necessary to establish a respondent’s eligibility to participate in an administrative review for this proposed action. Interested members of the public should review the proposal’s information to determine the applicable administrative review process and the eligibility requirements for that process. The date of the legal notice of opportunity to comment on this proposed action is the exclusive means for calculating the comment period. For proposals to be documented with an Environmental Assessment, the legal notice announcing the comment period appears in the Newspaper of Record . For Draft Environmental Impact Statements, the Notice of Availability announcing the comment period appears in the Federal Register.
Submitting Comments
If you wish to submit a comment, please send it to:
Jared Calvert
London Ranger District
761 S. Laurel Rd. , London, KY, 40351
jaredcalvert@fs.fed.us
Pine Creek Collaboration
7-13-16
The Forest Service hosted the Pine Creek Collaboration Workshop in London on April 20th, the first of several planned meetings that are part of the Integrated Resource Management Strategy (IRMS) for landscape assessments on the Daniel Boone National Forest. The Pine Creek analysis area includes most national forest lands along the Rockcastle River corridor from near I-75 to its confluence with the Cumberland River, except for the Cane Creek watershed. Some of the notable features of the area include the Rockcastle Wild and Scenic River corridor, Bee Rock and Rockcastle campgrounds, the old-growth forests of Rock Creek Research Natural Area and Angel Hollow, and several excellent trails, including a portion of the Sheltowee Trace National Recreation Trail. The analysis area also includes abandoned underground and surface mines in need of reclamation and restoration.
The IRMS process is intended to be a bridge between the forest management plan and project development. The Forest Service hopes to get input from the public regarding the full range of conditions and uses of the area in order to develop future management proposals. While future proposals won’t necessarily include logging, past IRMS processes make this a real concern. For example, the Crooked Creek project, which proposed logging Climax mountain and Little Egypt in Rockcastle County (and was later withdrawn after our successful campaign, and the Greenwood project, were both presented as being outcomes of IRMS processes. If you have a connection to this exceptional part of the Daniel Boone and would like to provide input, please contact us.
This article appeared in our Summer 2016 newsletter.
7-13-16
The Forest Service hosted the Pine Creek Collaboration Workshop in London on April 20th, the first of several planned meetings that are part of the Integrated Resource Management Strategy (IRMS) for landscape assessments on the Daniel Boone National Forest. The Pine Creek analysis area includes most national forest lands along the Rockcastle River corridor from near I-75 to its confluence with the Cumberland River, except for the Cane Creek watershed. Some of the notable features of the area include the Rockcastle Wild and Scenic River corridor, Bee Rock and Rockcastle campgrounds, the old-growth forests of Rock Creek Research Natural Area and Angel Hollow, and several excellent trails, including a portion of the Sheltowee Trace National Recreation Trail. The analysis area also includes abandoned underground and surface mines in need of reclamation and restoration.
The IRMS process is intended to be a bridge between the forest management plan and project development. The Forest Service hopes to get input from the public regarding the full range of conditions and uses of the area in order to develop future management proposals. While future proposals won’t necessarily include logging, past IRMS processes make this a real concern. For example, the Crooked Creek project, which proposed logging Climax mountain and Little Egypt in Rockcastle County (and was later withdrawn after our successful campaign, and the Greenwood project, were both presented as being outcomes of IRMS processes. If you have a connection to this exceptional part of the Daniel Boone and would like to provide input, please contact us.
This article appeared in our Summer 2016 newsletter.